In September, a verdict appeared in the case between Apple And Epic, began after adding to Fortnite direct purchases bypassing the App Store systems. Now there are litigation with appeals, so there is still far from the final solution. However, in the process there were new actors who may affect the result of the trial.

According to Bloomberg, 35 General Prosecutors of the States spoke in support of the appeal Epic Games. They did this with the help of independent expert conclusions, since they are not direct participants in a court investigation.

It is also reported that http://foxy-bingo-casino.co.uk/ with the position Epic Games 38 professors in the field of law, economics and business, as well as a consumer protection group, organization to protect civilian cyber-free rights and even Microsoft. According to all of the above, the conclusion of the judge Yvonna Gonzalez Rogers (Yvonne gonzalez rogers) is built on an erroneous analysis, violates antimonopoly legislation and should be canceled.

By decision Gonzalez Rogers The US Department of Justice also spoke, but it did not occupy any of the parties. The Office believes that the court issued an erroneous verdict, as Sherman’s law was incorrectly interpreted-the main antimonopoly legal act of the United States. Such errors in the interpretation are left by many antimonopoly decisions and practices outside the document protection sector.

Recall, in the fall, the court sided with Apple, not considering the company a monopolist. In addition, wards Tima Cook (Tim Cook) did not have to reduce the App Store commission and open access to the store for third -party payment systems, as required Epic.

Despite the "fluid fire" from all sides, representatives Apple confident in their rightness: “We are optimistic at the fact that the decision will be confirmed on appeal, and that the lawsuit Epic will not be satisfied ".